This interview with Benjamin Ryan is a BONUS episode for paying subscribers only.
The first few minutes of this episode is available to all listeners. To hear the entire conversation, become a paying subscriber here.
On April 10th, a big story broke in the gender world: The long-awaited report commissioned by the UK's National Health Service, known as the Cass Review, was released. As soon as the report hit the news cycle, gender-critical activists celebrated it as the final nail in the coffin of harmful practices, while trans-rights activists accused it of faulty methodology.
So who was right? This week, I spoke with Benjamin Ryan, a health and science reporter, to help unpack the Cass Review's data. Ben has spent years covering the intersection of health and public policy. He has a remarkably clear head and is a disciplined thinker about the youth gender medicine debate, so he is a great person to explain what is and is not in the Cass Review.
Guest Bio
Benjamin Ryan is an independent journalist who focuses on health care and science. He contributes to several major publications, including The New York Times, The Guardian, and NBC News. He has a particular interest in public health, medicine, and psychology, and has spent years reporting on HIV.
His work has received multiple awards from NLGJA: The Association of LGBTQ Journalists, including the Excellence in HIV/AIDS Coverage Award. Benjamin is a cancer survivor and enjoys reading, theatre, movies, biking, cooking, and photography in his spare time.
His oped for the Washington Post, “Psychiatrists learned the wrong lesson from the gay rights movement” published this morning. Read it here.
Follow him on Twitter here.
Follow his Substack here.
Know someone who would love this episode? Give a gift subscription!
Housekeeping
✈️ Unspeakeasy Retreats: See where we'll be in 2024!
🥂 Join The Unspeakeasy, my community for freethinking women.
🔥 Follow my other podcast, A Special Place in Hell.
